Video Capture

An adversary can leverage a computer's peripheral devices (e.g., integrated cameras or webcams) or applications (e.g., video call services) to capture video recordings for the purpose of gathering information. Images may also be captured from devices or applications, potentially in specified intervals, in lieu of video files.

Malware or scripts may be used to interact with the devices through an available API provided by the operating system or an application to capture video or images. Video or image files may be written to disk and exfiltrated later. This technique differs from Screen Capture due to use of specific devices or applications for video recording rather than capturing the victim's screen.

In macOS, there are a few different malware samples that record the user's webcam such as FruitFly and Proton. [1]

ID: T1125
Sub-techniques:  No sub-techniques
Tactic: Collection
Platforms: Windows, macOS
Permissions Required: User
CAPEC ID: CAPEC-634
Contributors: Praetorian
Version: 1.0
Created: 31 May 2017
Last Modified: 14 July 2020
Provided by LAYER 8

Procedure Examples

ID Name Description
S0331 Agent Tesla

Agent Tesla can access the victim’s webcam and record video.[2][3]

S0234 Bandook

Bandook has modules that are capable of capturing video from a victim's webcam.[4]

S0338 Cobian RAT

Cobian RAT has a feature to access the webcam on the victim’s machine.[5]

S0591 ConnectWise

ConnectWise can record video on remote hosts.[6]

S0115 Crimson

Crimson can capture webcam video on targeted systems.[7][8]

S0334 DarkComet

DarkComet can access the victim’s webcam to take pictures.[9][10]

S0021 Derusbi

Derusbi is capable of capturing video.[11]

S0363 Empire

Empire can capture webcam data on Windows and macOS systems.[12]

S0152 EvilGrab

EvilGrab has the capability to capture video from a victim machine.[13]

G0046 FIN7

FIN7 created a custom video recording capability that could be used to monitor operations in the victim's environment.[14][15]

S0434 Imminent Monitor

Imminent Monitor has a remote webcam monitoring capability.[16][17]

S0260 InvisiMole

InvisiMole can remotely activate the victim’s webcam to capture content.[18][19]

S0283 jRAT

jRAT has the capability to capture video from a webcam.[20][21]

S0265 Kazuar

Kazuar captures images from the webcam.[22]

S0409 Machete

Machete takes photos from the computer’s web camera.[23][24][25]

S0336 NanoCore

NanoCore can access the victim's webcam and capture data.[26][27]

S0385 njRAT

njRAT can access the victim's webcam.[28][29]

S0644 ObliqueRAT

ObliqueRAT can capture images from webcams on compromised hosts.[30]

S0428 PoetRAT

PoetRAT has used a Python tool named Bewmac to record the webcam on compromised hosts.[31]

S0192 Pupy

Pupy can access a connected webcam and capture pictures.[32]

S0262 QuasarRAT

QuasarRAT can perform webcam viewing.[33][34]

S0332 Remcos

Remcos can access a system’s webcam and take pictures.[35]

S0379 Revenge RAT

Revenge RAT has the ability to access the webcam.[36][37]

S0461 SDBbot

SDBbot has the ability to record video on a compromised host.[38][39]

G0091 Silence

Silence has been observed making videos of victims to observe bank employees day to day activities.[40][41]

S0098 T9000

T9000 uses the Skype API to record audio and video calls. It writes encrypted data to %APPDATA%\Intel\Skype.[42]

S0467 TajMahal

TajMahal has the ability to capture webcam video.[43]

S0412 ZxShell

ZxShell has a command to perform video device spying.[44]

Mitigations

This type of attack technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on the abuse of system features.

Detection

ID Data Source Data Component
DS0017 Command Command Execution
DS0009 Process OS API Execution

Detection of this technique may be difficult due to the various APIs that may be used. Telemetry data regarding API use may not be useful depending on how a system is normally used, but may provide context to other potentially malicious activity occurring on a system.

Behavior that could indicate technique use include an unknown or unusual process accessing APIs associated with devices or software that interact with the video camera, recording devices, or recording software, and a process periodically writing files to disk that contain video or camera image data.

References

  1. Patrick Wardle. (n.d.). Retrieved March 20, 2018.
  2. The DigiTrust Group. (2017, January 12). The Rise of Agent Tesla. Retrieved November 5, 2018.
  3. Brumaghin, E., et al. (2018, October 15). Old dog, new tricks - Analysing new RTF-based campaign distributing Agent Tesla, Loki with PyREbox. Retrieved November 5, 2018.
  4. Galperin, E., Et al.. (2016, August). I Got a Letter From the Government the Other Day.... Retrieved April 25, 2018.
  5. Yadav, A., et al. (2017, August 31). Cobian RAT – A backdoored RAT. Retrieved November 13, 2018.
  6. Mele, G. et al. (2021, February 10). Probable Iranian Cyber Actors, Static Kitten, Conducting Cyberespionage Campaign Targeting UAE and Kuwait Government Agencies. Retrieved March 17, 2021.
  7. Huss, D. (2016, March 1). Operation Transparent Tribe. Retrieved June 8, 2016.
  8. Dedola, G. (2020, August 20). Transparent Tribe: Evolution analysis, part 1. Retrieved September 2, 2021.
  9. TrendMicro. (2014, September 03). DARKCOMET. Retrieved November 6, 2018.
  10. Kujawa, A. (2018, March 27). You dirty RAT! Part 1: DarkComet. Retrieved November 6, 2018.
  11. FireEye. (2018, March 16). Suspected Chinese Cyber Espionage Group (TEMP.Periscope) Targeting U.S. Engineering and Maritime Industries. Retrieved April 11, 2018.
  12. Schroeder, W., Warner, J., Nelson, M. (n.d.). Github PowerShellEmpire. Retrieved April 28, 2016.
  13. PwC and BAE Systems. (2017, April). Operation Cloud Hopper: Technical Annex. Retrieved April 13, 2017.
  14. Carr, N., et al. (2018, August 01). On the Hunt for FIN7: Pursuing an Enigmatic and Evasive Global Criminal Operation. Retrieved August 23, 2018.
  15. Department of Justice. (2018, August 01). HOW FIN7 ATTACKED AND STOLE DATA. Retrieved August 24, 2018.
  16. Unit 42. (2019, December 2). Imminent Monitor – a RAT Down Under. Retrieved May 5, 2020.
  17. QiAnXin Threat Intelligence Center. (2019, February 18). APT-C-36: Continuous Attacks Targeting Colombian Government Institutions and Corporations. Retrieved May 5, 2020.
  18. Hromcová, Z. (2018, June 07). InvisiMole: Surprisingly equipped spyware, undercover since 2013. Retrieved July 10, 2018.
  19. Hromcova, Z. and Cherpanov, A. (2020, June). INVISIMOLE: THE HIDDEN PART OF THE STORY. Retrieved July 16, 2020.
  20. Sharma, R. (2018, August 15). Revamped jRAT Uses New Anti-Parsing Techniques. Retrieved September 21, 2018.
  21. Kamluk, V. & Gostev, A. (2016, February). Adwind - A Cross-Platform RAT. Retrieved April 23, 2019.
  22. Levene, B, et al. (2017, May 03). Kazuar: Multiplatform Espionage Backdoor with API Access. Retrieved July 17, 2018.
  1. Kaspersky Global Research and Analysis Team. (2014, August 20). El Machete. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  2. The Cylance Threat Research Team. (2017, March 22). El Machete's Malware Attacks Cut Through LATAM. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  3. kate. (2020, September 25). APT-C-43 steals Venezuelan military secrets to provide intelligence support for the reactionaries — HpReact campaign. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
  4. The DigiTrust Group. (2017, January 01). NanoCore Is Not Your Average RAT. Retrieved November 9, 2018.
  5. Kasza, A., Halfpop, T. (2016, February 09). NanoCoreRAT Behind an Increase in Tax-Themed Phishing E-mails. Retrieved November 9, 2018.
  6. Fidelis Cybersecurity. (2013, June 28). Fidelis Threat Advisory #1009: "njRAT" Uncovered. Retrieved June 4, 2019.
  7. Scott-Railton, J., et al. (2016, August 2). Group5: Syria and the Iranian Connection. Retrieved September 26, 2016.
  8. Malhotra, A. (2021, March 2). ObliqueRAT returns with new campaign using hijacked websites. Retrieved September 2, 2021.
  9. Mercer, W, et al. (2020, April 16). PoetRAT: Python RAT uses COVID-19 lures to target Azerbaijan public and private sectors. Retrieved April 27, 2020.
  10. Nicolas Verdier. (n.d.). Retrieved January 29, 2018.
  11. MaxXor. (n.d.). QuasarRAT. Retrieved July 10, 2018.
  12. Meltzer, M, et al. (2018, June 07). Patchwork APT Group Targets US Think Tanks. Retrieved July 16, 2018.
  13. Bacurio, F., Salvio, J. (2017, February 14). REMCOS: A New RAT In The Wild. Retrieved November 6, 2018.
  14. Livelli, K, et al. (2018, November 12). Operation Shaheen. Retrieved May 1, 2019.
  15. Gannon, M. (2019, February 11). With Upgrades in Delivery and Support Infrastructure, Revenge RAT Malware is a Bigger Threat. Retrieved May 1, 2019.
  16. Schwarz, D. et al. (2019, October 16). TA505 Distributes New SDBbot Remote Access Trojan with Get2 Downloader. Retrieved May 29, 2020.
  17. Frydrych, M. (2020, April 14). TA505 Continues to Infect Networks With SDBbot RAT. Retrieved May 29, 2020.
  18. GReAT. (2017, November 1). Silence – a new Trojan attacking financial organizations. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  19. Group-IB. (2018, September). Silence: Moving Into the Darkside. Retrieved May 5, 2020.
  20. Grunzweig, J. and Miller-Osborn, J.. (2016, February 4). T9000: Advanced Modular Backdoor Uses Complex Anti-Analysis Techniques. Retrieved April 15, 2016.
  21. GReAT. (2019, April 10). Project TajMahal – a sophisticated new APT framework. Retrieved October 14, 2019.
  22. Allievi, A., et al. (2014, October 28). Threat Spotlight: Group 72, Opening the ZxShell. Retrieved September 24, 2019.