Adversaries may attempt to take advantage of a weakness in an Internet-facing computer or program using software, data, or commands in order to cause unintended or unanticipated behavior. The weakness in the system can be a bug, a glitch, or a design vulnerability. These applications are often websites, but can include databases (like SQL)[1], standard services (like SMB[2] or SSH), network device administration and management protocols (like SNMP and Smart Install[3][4]), and any other applications with Internet accessible open sockets, such as web servers and related services.[5] Depending on the flaw being exploited this may include Exploitation for Defense Evasion.
If an application is hosted on cloud-based infrastructure and/or is containerized, then exploiting it may lead to compromise of the underlying instance or container. This can allow an adversary a path to access the cloud or container APIs, exploit container host access via Escape to Host, or take advantage of weak identity and access management policies.
For websites and databases, the OWASP top 10 and CWE top 25 highlight the most common web-based vulnerabilities.[6][7]
ID | Name | Description |
---|---|---|
G0007 | APT28 |
APT28 has used a variety of public exploits, including CVE 2020-0688 and CVE 2020-17144, to gain execution on vulnerable Microsoft Exchange; they have also conducted SQL injection attacks against external websites.[8][9] |
G0016 | APT29 |
APT29 has exploited CVE-2019-19781 for Citrix, CVE-2019-11510 for Pulse Secure VPNs, CVE-2018-13379 for FortiGate VPNs, and CVE-2019-9670 in Zimbra software to gain access. They have also exploited CVE-2020-0688 against the Microsoft Exchange Control Panel to regain access to a network.[10][11][12] |
G0087 | APT39 | |
G0096 | APT41 |
APT41 exploited CVE-2020-10189 against Zoho ManageEngine Desktop Central, and CVE-2019-19781 to compromise Citrix Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) and gateway devices.[14] |
G0001 | Axiom |
Axiom has been observed using SQL injection to gain access to systems.[15][16] |
G0135 | BackdoorDiplomacy |
BackdoorDiplomacy has exploited CVE-2020-5902, an F5 BIP-IP vulnerability, to drop a Linux backdoor. BackdoorDiplomacy has also exploited mis-configured Plesk servers.[17] |
G0098 | BlackTech |
BlackTech has exploited a buffer overflow vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 6.0, CVE-2017-7269, in order to establish a new HTTP or command and control (C2) server.[18] |
G0108 | Blue Mockingbird |
Blue Mockingbird has gained initial access by exploiting CVE-2019-18935, a vulnerability within Telerik UI for ASP.NET AJAX.[19] |
G0117 | Fox Kitten |
Fox Kitten has exploited known vulnerabilities in Fortinet, PulseSecure, and Palo Alto VPN appliances.[20][21][22][23][24] |
G0093 | GALLIUM |
GALLIUM exploited a publicly-facing servers including Wildfly/JBoss servers to gain access to the network.[25][26] |
G0115 | GOLD SOUTHFIELD |
GOLD SOUTHFIELD has exploited Oracle WebLogic vulnerabilities for initial compromise.[27] |
S0224 | Havij | |
G0045 | menuPass |
menuPass has leveraged vulnerabilities in Pulse Secure VPNs to hijack sessions.[29] |
G0014 | Night Dragon |
Night Dragon has performed SQL injection attacks of extranet web servers to gain access.[30] |
G0116 | Operation Wocao |
Operation Wocao has gained initial access via vulnerable webservers.[31] |
G0106 | Rocke |
Rocke exploited Apache Struts, Oracle WebLogic (CVE-2017-10271), and Adobe ColdFusion (CVE-2017-3066) vulnerabilities to deliver malware.[32][33] |
S0623 | Siloscape |
Siloscape is executed after the attacker gains initial access to a Windows container using a known vulnerability.[34] |
S0516 | SoreFang |
SoreFang can gain access by exploiting a Sangfor SSL VPN vulnerability that allows for the placement and delivery of malicious update binaries.[35] |
S0225 | sqlmap |
sqlmap can be used to automate exploitation of SQL injection vulnerabilities.[36] |
G0123 | Volatile Cedar |
Volatile Cedar has targeted publicly facing web servers, with both automatic and manual vulnerability discovery.[37] [38] |
ID | Mitigation | Description |
---|---|---|
M1048 | Application Isolation and Sandboxing |
Application isolation will limit what other processes and system features the exploited target can access. |
M1050 | Exploit Protection |
Web Application Firewalls may be used to limit exposure of applications to prevent exploit traffic from reaching the application. |
M1030 | Network Segmentation |
Segment externally facing servers and services from the rest of the network with a DMZ or on separate hosting infrastructure. |
M1026 | Privileged Account Management |
Use least privilege for service accounts will limit what permissions the exploited process gets on the rest of the system. |
M1051 | Update Software |
Update software regularly by employing patch management for externally exposed applications. |
M1016 | Vulnerability Scanning |
Regularly scan externally facing systems for vulnerabilities and establish procedures to rapidly patch systems when critical vulnerabilities are discovered through scanning and through public disclosure.[6] |
ID | Data Source | Data Component |
---|---|---|
DS0015 | Application Log | Application Log Content |
DS0029 | Network Traffic | Network Traffic Content |
Monitor application logs for abnormal behavior that may indicate attempted or successful exploitation. Use deep packet inspection to look for artifacts of common exploit traffic, such as SQL injection. Web Application Firewalls may detect improper inputs attempting exploitation.