1. Home
  2. Techniques
  3. Enterprise
  4. Query Registry

Query Registry

Adversaries may interact with the Windows Registry to gather information about the system, configuration, and installed software.

The Registry contains a significant amount of information about the operating system, configuration, software, and security.[1] Information can easily be queried using the Reg utility, though other means to access the Registry exist. Some of the information may help adversaries to further their operation within a network. Adversaries may use the information from Query Registry during automated discovery to shape follow-on behaviors, including whether or not the adversary fully infects the target and/or attempts specific actions.

ID: T1012
Sub-techniques:  No sub-techniques
ⓘ
Tactic: Discovery
ⓘ
Platforms: Windows
ⓘ
Permissions Required: Administrator, SYSTEM, User
ⓘ
CAPEC ID: CAPEC-647
Version: 1.2
Created: 31 May 2017
Last Modified: 26 March 2020
Provided by LAYER 8

Procedure Examples

ID Name Description
S0045 ADVSTORESHELL

ADVSTORESHELL can enumerate registry keys.[2][3]
G0050 APT32

APT32's backdoor can query the Windows Registry to gather system information. [4]
G0087 APT39

APT39 has used various strains of malware to query the Registry.[5]
S0438 Attor

Attor has opened the registry and performed query searches.[6]
S0344 Azorult

Azorult can check for installed software on the system under the Registry key Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall.[7]
S0414 BabyShark

BabyShark has executed the reg query command for HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Terminal Server Client\Default.[8]

S0031 BACKSPACE

BACKSPACE is capable of enumerating and making modifications to an infected system's Registry.[9]
S0239 Bankshot

Bankshot searches for certain Registry keys to be configured before executing the payload.[10]
S0534 Bazar

Bazar can query Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for installed applications.[11][12]
S0574 BendyBear

BendyBear can query the host's Registry key at HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Console\QuickEdit to retrieve data.[13]
S0570 BitPaymer

BitPaymer can use the RegEnumKeyW to iterate through Registry keys.[14]

S0252 Brave Prince

Brave Prince gathers information about the Registry.[15]
S0030 Carbanak

Carbanak checks the Registry key HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings for proxy configurations information.[16]
S0484 Carberp

Carberp has searched the Image File Execution Options registry key for "Debugger" within every subkey.[17]
S0335 Carbon

Carbon enumerates values in the Registry.[18]
S0348 Cardinal RAT

Cardinal RAT contains watchdog functionality that periodically ensures HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows\Load is set to point to its executable.[19]
G0114 Chimera

Chimera has queried Registry keys using reg query \\HKU\\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Terminal Server Client\Servers and reg query \\HKU\\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings.[20]
S0023 CHOPSTICK

CHOPSTICK provides access to the Windows Registry, which can be used to gather information.[21]
S0154 Cobalt Strike

Cobalt Strike can query HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\\Excel\Security\AccessVBOM\ to determine if the security setting for restricting default programmatic access is enabled.[22][23]
S0126 ComRAT

ComRAT can check the default browser by querying HKCR\http\shell\open\command.[24]
S0115 Crimson

Crimson can check the Registry for the presence of HKCU\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\last_edate to determine how long it has been installed on a host.[25]
S0354 Denis

Denis queries the Registry for keys and values.[26]
S0021 Derusbi

Derusbi is capable of enumerating Registry keys and values.[27]
S0186 DownPaper

DownPaper searches and reads the value of the Windows Update Registry Run key.[28]
G0074 Dragonfly 2.0

Dragonfly 2.0 queried the Registry to identify victim information.[29]
S0567 Dtrack

Dtrack can collect the RegisteredOwner, RegisteredOrganization, and InstallDate registry values.[30]
S0091 Epic

Epic uses the rem reg query command to obtain values from Registry keys.[31]
S0512 FatDuke

FatDuke can get user agent strings for the default browser from HKCU\Software\Classes\http\shell\open\command.[32]
S0267 FELIXROOT

FELIXROOT queries the Registry for specific keys for potential privilege escalation and proxy information. FELIXROOT has also used WMI to query the Windows Registry.[33][34]
S0182 FinFisher

FinFisher queries Registry values as part of its anti-sandbox checks.[35][36]
G0117 Fox Kitten

Fox Kitten has accessed Registry hives ntuser.dat and UserClass.dat.[37]
S0032 gh0st RAT

gh0st RAT has checked for the existence of a Service key to determine if it has already been installed on the system.[38]
S0249 Gold Dragon

Gold Dragon enumerates registry keys with the command regkeyenum and obtains information for the Registry key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run.[15]
S0376 HOPLIGHT

A variant of HOPLIGHT hooks lsass.exe, and lsass.exe then checks the Registry for the data value 'rdpproto' under the key SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Lsa Name.[39]
S0203 Hydraq

Hydraq creates a backdoor through which remote attackers can retrieve system information, such as CPU speed, from Registry keys.[40][41]
S0604 Industroyer

Industroyer has a data wiper component that enumerates keys in the Registry HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services.[42]
S0260 InvisiMole

InvisiMole can enumerate Registry values, keys, and data.[43]
S0201 JPIN

JPIN can enumerate Registry keys.[44]
G0032 Lazarus Group

Lazarus Group malware IndiaIndia checks Registry keys within HKCU and HKLM to determine if certain applications are present, including SecureCRT, Terminal Services, RealVNC, TightVNC, UltraVNC, Radmin, mRemote, TeamViewer, FileZilla, pcAnyware, and Remote Desktop. Another Lazarus Group malware sample checks for the presence of the following Registry key:HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Bitcoin\Bitcoin-Qt.[45][46][47]
S0513 LiteDuke

LiteDuke can query the Registry to check for the presence of HKCU\Software\KasperskyLab.[32]
S0532 Lucifer

Lucifer can check for existing stratum cryptomining information in HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\spreadCpuXmr – %stratum info%.[48]
S0385 njRAT

njRAT can read specific registry values.[49]
G0049 OilRig

OilRig has used reg query "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Terminal Server Client\Default" on a victim to query the Registry.[50]
G0116 Operation Wocao

Operation Wocao has queried the registry to detect recent PuTTY sessions.[51]
S0165 OSInfo

OSInfo queries the registry to look for information about Terminal Services.[52]
S0517 Pillowmint

Pillowmint has used shellcode which reads code stored in the registry keys \REGISTRY\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\DRM using the native Windows API as well as read HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters\Interfaces as part of its C2.[53]

S0013 PlugX

PlugX can enumerate and query for information contained within the Windows Registry.[54][55]
S0145 POWERSOURCE

POWERSOURCE queries Registry keys in preparation for setting Run keys to achieve persistence.[56]
S0194 PowerSploit

PowerSploit contains a collection of Privesc-PowerUp modules that can query Registry keys for potential opportunities.[57][58]
S0184 POWRUNER

POWRUNER may query the Registry by running reg query on a victim.[59]
S0238 Proxysvc

Proxysvc gathers product names from the Registry key: HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion ProductName and the processor description from the Registry key HKLM\HARDWARE\DESCRIPTION\System\CentralProcessor\0 ProcessorNameString.[60]
S0269 QUADAGENT

QUADAGENT checks if a value exists within a Registry key in the HKCU hive whose name is the same as the scheduled task it has created.[61]
S0241 RATANKBA

RATANKBA uses the command reg query "HKCU\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\InternetSettings".[62]
S0172 Reaver

Reaver queries the Registry to determine the correct Startup path to use for persistence.[63]
S0075 Reg

Reg may be used to gather details from the Windows Registry of a local or remote system at the command-line interface.[64]
S0496 REvil

REvil can query the Registry to get random file extensions to append to encrypted files.[65]
S0240 ROKRAT

ROKRAT accesses the HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\mssmbios\Data\SMBiosData Registry key to obtain the System manufacturer value to identify the machine type.[66]
S0140 Shamoon

Shamoon queries several Registry keys to identify hard disk partitions to overwrite.[67]
S0589 Sibot

Sibot has queried the registry for proxy server information.[68]
S0627 SodaMaster

SodaMaster has the ability to query the Registry to detect a key specific to VMware.[69]
G0038 Stealth Falcon

Stealth Falcon malware attempts to determine the installed version of .NET by querying the Registry.[70]
S0380 StoneDrill

StoneDrill has looked in the registry to find the default browser path.[71]
S0603 Stuxnet

Stuxnet searches the Registry for indicators of security programs.[72]
S0559 SUNBURST

SUNBURST collected the registry value HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Cryptography\MachineGuid from compromised hosts.[73]
S0242 SynAck

SynAck enumerates Registry keys associated with event logs.[74]
S0011 Taidoor

Taidoor can query the Registry on compromised hosts using RegQueryValueExA.[75]
S0560 TEARDROP

TEARDROP checked that HKU\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\CTF existed before decoding its embedded payload.[73][76]

G0027 Threat Group-3390

A Threat Group-3390 tool can read and decrypt stored Registry values.[77]
G0010 Turla

Turla surveys a system upon check-in to discover information in the Windows Registry with the reg query command.[31] Turla has also retrieved PowerShell payloads hidden in Registry keys as well as checking keys associated with null session named pipes .[78]
S0386 Ursnif

Ursnif has used Reg to query the Registry for installed programs.[79][80]
S0476 Valak

Valak can use the Registry for code updates and to collect credentials.[81]
S0180 Volgmer

Volgmer checks the system for certain Registry keys.[82]
S0612 WastedLocker

WastedLocker checks for specific registry keys related to the UCOMIEnumConnections and IActiveScriptParseProcedure32 interfaces.[83]
S0579 Waterbear

Waterbear can query the Registry to retrieve data.[84]
S0155 WINDSHIELD

WINDSHIELD can gather Registry values.[85]
S0251 Zebrocy

Zebrocy executes the reg query command to obtain information in the Registry.[86]
S0330 Zeus Panda

Zeus Panda checks for the existence of a Registry key and if it contains certain values.[87]
G0128 ZIRCONIUM

ZIRCONIUM has used a tool to query the Registry for proxy settings.[88]
S0412 ZxShell

ZxShell can query the netsvc group value data located in the svchost group Registry key.[89]

Mitigations

This type of attack technique cannot be easily mitigated with preventive controls since it is based on the abuse of system features.

Detection

ID Data Source Data Component
DS0017 Command Command Execution
DS0009 Process OS API Execution
Process Creation
DS0024 Windows Registry Windows Registry Key Access

System and network discovery techniques normally occur throughout an operation as an adversary learns the environment. Data and events should not be viewed in isolation, but as part of a chain of behavior that could lead to other activities, such as Lateral Movement, based on the information obtained.

Interaction with the Windows Registry may come from the command line using utilities such as Reg or through running malware that may interact with the Registry through an API. Command-line invocation of utilities used to query the Registry may be detected through process and command-line monitoring. Remote access tools with built-in features may interact directly with the Windows API to gather information. Information may also be acquired through Windows system management tools such as Windows Management Instrumentation and PowerShell.

References

  1. Wikipedia. (n.d.). Windows Registry. Retrieved February 2, 2015.
  2. ESET. (2016, October). En Route with Sednit - Part 2: Observing the Comings and Goings. Retrieved November 21, 2016.
  3. Bitdefender. (2015, December). APT28 Under the Scope. Retrieved February 23, 2017.
  4. Dumont, R. (2019, March 20). Fake or Fake: Keeping up with OceanLotus decoys. Retrieved April 1, 2019.
  5. FBI. (2020, September 17). Indicators of Compromise Associated with Rana Intelligence Computing, also known as Advanced Persistent Threat 39, Chafer, Cadelspy, Remexi, and ITG07. Retrieved December 10, 2020.
  6. Hromcova, Z. (2019, October). AT COMMANDS, TOR-BASED COMMUNICATIONS: MEET ATTOR, A FANTASY CREATURE AND ALSO A SPY PLATFORM. Retrieved May 6, 2020.
  7. Yan, T., et al. (2018, November 21). New Wine in Old Bottle: New Azorult Variant Found in FindMyName Campaign using Fallout Exploit Kit. Retrieved November 29, 2018.
  8. Unit 42. (2019, February 22). New BabyShark Malware Targets U.S. National Security Think Tanks. Retrieved October 7, 2019.
  9. FireEye Labs. (2015, April). APT30 AND THE MECHANICS OF A LONG-RUNNING CYBER ESPIONAGE OPERATION. Retrieved May 1, 2015.
  10. US-CERT. (2017, December 13). Malware Analysis Report (MAR) - 10135536-B. Retrieved July 17, 2018.
  11. Cybereason Nocturnus. (2020, July 16). A BAZAR OF TRICKS: FOLLOWING TEAM9’S DEVELOPMENT CYCLES. Retrieved November 18, 2020.
  12. Pantazopoulos, N. (2020, June 2). In-depth analysis of the new Team9 malware family. Retrieved December 1, 2020.
  13. Harbison, M. (2021, February 9). BendyBear: Novel Chinese Shellcode Linked With Cyber Espionage Group BlackTech. Retrieved February 16, 2021.
  14. Frankoff, S., Hartley, B. (2018, November 14). Big Game Hunting: The Evolution of INDRIK SPIDER From Dridex Wire Fraud to BitPaymer Targeted Ransomware. Retrieved January 6, 2021.
  15. Sherstobitoff, R., Saavedra-Morales, J. (2018, February 02). Gold Dragon Widens Olympics Malware Attacks, Gains Permanent Presence on Victims’ Systems. Retrieved June 6, 2018.
  16. Bennett, J., Vengerik, B. (2017, June 12). Behind the CARBANAK Backdoor. Retrieved June 11, 2018.
  17. Giuliani, M., Allievi, A. (2011, February 28). Carberp - a modular information stealing trojan. Retrieved July 15, 2020.
  18. ESET. (2017, March 30). Carbon Paper: Peering into Turla’s second stage backdoor. Retrieved November 7, 2018.
  19. Grunzweig, J.. (2017, April 20). Cardinal RAT Active for Over Two Years. Retrieved December 8, 2018.
  20. Jansen, W . (2021, January 12). Abusing cloud services to fly under the radar. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
  21. FireEye. (2015). APT28: A WINDOW INTO RUSSIA’S CYBER ESPIONAGE OPERATIONS?. Retrieved August 19, 2015.
  22. Mavis, N. (2020, September 21). The Art and Science of Detecting Cobalt Strike. Retrieved April 6, 2021.
  23. Strategic Cyber LLC. (2020, November 5). Cobalt Strike: Advanced Threat Tactics for Penetration Testers. Retrieved April 13, 2021.
  24. Faou, M. (2020, May). From Agent.btz to ComRAT v4: A ten-year journey. Retrieved June 15, 2020.
  25. Huss, D. (2016, March 1). Operation Transparent Tribe. Retrieved June 8, 2016.
  26. Dahan, A. (2017). Operation Cobalt Kitty. Retrieved December 27, 2018.
  27. FireEye. (2018, March 16). Suspected Chinese Cyber Espionage Group (TEMP.Periscope) Targeting U.S. Engineering and Maritime Industries. Retrieved April 11, 2018.
  28. ClearSky Cyber Security. (2017, December). Charming Kitten. Retrieved December 27, 2017.
  29. US-CERT. (2018, March 16). Alert (TA18-074A): Russian Government Cyber Activity Targeting Energy and Other Critical Infrastructure Sectors. Retrieved June 6, 2018.
  30. Hod Gavriel. (2019, November 21). Dtrack: In-depth analysis of APT on a nuclear power plant. Retrieved January 20, 2021.
  31. Kaspersky Lab's Global Research and Analysis Team. (2014, August 7). The Epic Turla Operation: Solving some of the mysteries of Snake/Uroburos. Retrieved December 11, 2014.
  32. Faou, M., Tartare, M., Dupuy, T. (2019, October). OPERATION GHOST. Retrieved September 23, 2020.
  33. Patil, S. (2018, June 26). Microsoft Office Vulnerabilities Used to Distribute FELIXROOT Backdoor in Recent Campaign. Retrieved July 31, 2018.
  34. Cherepanov, A. (2018, October). GREYENERGY A successor to BlackEnergy. Retrieved November 15, 2018.
  35. FinFisher. (n.d.). Retrieved December 20, 2017.
  36. Allievi, A.,Flori, E. (2018, March 01). FinFisher exposed: A researcher’s tale of defeating traps, tricks, and complex virtual machines. Retrieved July 9, 2018.
  37. CISA. (2020, September 15). Iran-Based Threat Actor Exploits VPN Vulnerabilities. Retrieved December 21, 2020.
  38. Quinn, J. (2019, March 25). The odd case of a Gh0stRAT variant. Retrieved July 15, 2020.
  39. US-CERT. (2019, April 10). MAR-10135536-8 – North Korean Trojan: HOPLIGHT. Retrieved April 19, 2019.
  40. Symantec Security Response. (2010, January 18). The Trojan.Hydraq Incident. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
  41. Lelli, A. (2010, January 11). Trojan.Hydraq. Retrieved February 20, 2018.
  42. Anton Cherepanov. (2017, June 12). Win32/Industroyer: A new threat for industrial controls systems. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
  43. Hromcová, Z. (2018, June 07). InvisiMole: Surprisingly equipped spyware, undercover since 2013. Retrieved July 10, 2018.
  44. Windows Defender Advanced Threat Hunting Team. (2016, April 29). PLATINUM: Targeted attacks in South and Southeast Asia. Retrieved February 15, 2018.
  45. Novetta Threat Research Group. (2016, February 24). Operation Blockbuster: Unraveling the Long Thread of the Sony Attack. Retrieved February 25, 2016.
  1. Novetta Threat Research Group. (2016, February 24). Operation Blockbuster: Loaders, Installers and Uninstallers Report. Retrieved March 2, 2016.
  2. Sherstobitoff, R. (2018, February 12). Lazarus Resurfaces, Targets Global Banks and Bitcoin Users. Retrieved February 19, 2018.
  3. Hsu, K. et al. (2020, June 24). Lucifer: New Cryptojacking and DDoS Hybrid Malware Exploiting High and Critical Vulnerabilities to Infect Windows Devices. Retrieved November 16, 2020.
  4. Pascual, C. (2018, November 27). AutoIt-Compiled Worm Affecting Removable Media Delivers Fileless Version of BLADABINDI/njRAT Backdoor. Retrieved June 4, 2019.
  5. Falcone, R. and Lee, B.. (2016, May 26). The OilRig Campaign: Attacks on Saudi Arabian Organizations Deliver Helminth Backdoor. Retrieved May 3, 2017.
  6. Dantzig, M. v., Schamper, E. (2019, December 19). Operation Wocao: Shining a light on one of China’s hidden hacking groups. Retrieved October 8, 2020.
  7. Symantec Security Response. (2016, September 6). Buckeye cyberespionage group shifts gaze from US to Hong Kong. Retrieved September 26, 2016.
  8. Trustwave SpiderLabs. (2020, June 22). Pillowmint: FIN7’s Monkey Thief . Retrieved July 27, 2020.
  9. Vasilenko, R. (2013, December 17). An Analysis of PlugX Malware. Retrieved November 24, 2015.
  10. Computer Incident Response Center Luxembourg. (2013, March 29). Analysis of a PlugX variant. Retrieved November 5, 2018.
  11. Brumaghin, E. and Grady, C.. (2017, March 2). Covert Channels and Poor Decisions: The Tale of DNSMessenger. Retrieved March 8, 2017.
  12. PowerShellMafia. (2012, May 26). PowerSploit - A PowerShell Post-Exploitation Framework. Retrieved February 6, 2018.
  13. PowerSploit. (n.d.). PowerSploit. Retrieved February 6, 2018.
  14. Sardiwal, M, et al. (2017, December 7). New Targeted Attack in the Middle East by APT34, a Suspected Iranian Threat Group, Using CVE-2017-11882 Exploit. Retrieved December 20, 2017.
  15. Sherstobitoff, R., Malhotra, A. (2018, April 24). Analyzing Operation GhostSecret: Attack Seeks to Steal Data Worldwide. Retrieved May 16, 2018.
  16. Lee, B., Falcone, R. (2018, July 25). OilRig Targets Technology Service Provider and Government Agency with QUADAGENT. Retrieved August 9, 2018.
  17. Trend Micro. (2017, February 27). RATANKBA: Delving into Large-scale Watering Holes against Enterprises. Retrieved May 22, 2018.
  18. Grunzweig, J. and Miller-Osborn, J. (2017, November 10). New Malware with Ties to SunOrcal Discovered. Retrieved November 16, 2017.
  19. Microsoft. (2012, April 17). Reg. Retrieved May 1, 2015.
  20. Counter Threat Unit Research Team. (2019, September 24). REvil/Sodinokibi Ransomware. Retrieved August 4, 2020.
  21. Mercer, W., Rascagneres, P. (2018, January 16). Korea In The Crosshairs. Retrieved May 21, 2018.
  22. Falcone, R.. (2016, November 30). Shamoon 2: Return of the Disttrack Wiper. Retrieved January 11, 2017.
  23. Nafisi, R., Lelli, A. (2021, March 4). GoldMax, GoldFinder, and Sibot: Analyzing NOBELIUM’s layered persistence. Retrieved March 8, 2021.
  24. GREAT. (2021, March 30). APT10: sophisticated multi-layered loader Ecipekac discovered in A41APT campaign. Retrieved June 17, 2021.
  25. Marczak, B. and Scott-Railton, J.. (2016, May 29). Keep Calm and (Don’t) Enable Macros: A New Threat Actor Targets UAE Dissidents. Retrieved June 8, 2016.
  26. Kaspersky Lab. (2017, March 7). From Shamoon to StoneDrill: Wipers attacking Saudi organizations and beyond. Retrieved March 14, 2019.
  27. Nicolas Falliere, Liam O. Murchu, Eric Chien. (2011, February). W32.Stuxnet Dossier. Retrieved December 7, 2020.
  28. FireEye. (2020, December 13). Highly Evasive Attacker Leverages SolarWinds Supply Chain to Compromise Multiple Global Victims With SUNBURST Backdoor. Retrieved January 4, 2021.
  29. Ivanov, A. et al. (2018, May 7). SynAck targeted ransomware uses the Doppelgänging technique. Retrieved May 22, 2018.
  30. CISA, FBI, DOD. (2021, August). MAR-10292089-1.v2 – Chinese Remote Access Trojan: TAIDOOR. Retrieved August 24, 2021.
  31. MSTIC, CDOC, 365 Defender Research Team. (2021, January 20). Deep dive into the Solorigate second-stage activation: From SUNBURST to TEARDROP and Raindrop . Retrieved January 22, 2021.
  32. Pantazopoulos, N., Henry T. (2018, May 18). Emissary Panda – A potential new malicious tool. Retrieved June 25, 2018.
  33. Faou, M. and Dumont R.. (2019, May 29). A dive into Turla PowerShell usage. Retrieved June 14, 2019.
  34. Caragay, R. (2015, March 26). URSNIF: The Multifaceted Malware. Retrieved June 5, 2019.
  35. Sioting, S. (2013, June 15). BKDR_URSNIF.SM. Retrieved June 5, 2019.
  36. Duncan, B. (2020, July 24). Evolution of Valak, from Its Beginnings to Mass Distribution. Retrieved August 31, 2020.
  37. US-CERT. (2017, November 01). Malware Analysis Report (MAR) - 10135536-D. Retrieved July 16, 2018.
  38. Antenucci, S., Pantazopoulos, N., Sandee, M. (2020, June 23). WastedLocker: A New Ransomware Variant Developed By The Evil Corp Group. Retrieved September 14, 2021.
  39. Su, V. et al. (2019, December 11). Waterbear Returns, Uses API Hooking to Evade Security. Retrieved February 22, 2021.
  40. Carr, N.. (2017, May 14). Cyber Espionage is Alive and Well: APT32 and the Threat to Global Corporations. Retrieved June 18, 2017.
  41. ESET Research. (2019, May 22). A journey to Zebrocy land. Retrieved June 20, 2019.
  42. Ebach, L. (2017, June 22). Analysis Results of Zeus.Variant.Panda. Retrieved November 5, 2018.
  43. Singh, S. and Antil, S. (2020, October 27). APT-31 Leverages COVID-19 Vaccine Theme and Abuses Legitimate Online Services. Retrieved March 24, 2021.
  44. Allievi, A., et al. (2014, October 28). Threat Spotlight: Group 72, Opening the ZxShell. Retrieved September 24, 2019.